Toastmasters LogoToday I was supposed to attend my second day at the local toastmasters club at 8 AM, but I didn’t go. In fact, I quit!

I know what you’re probably thinking: my first time experience proved scary so I chickened out this time. Nice try, but not me. You guys know I love public speaking and I even gave out my first ever public speech recently.

So why did I quit?

Well, simply put, there’s a major flaw in toastmasters clubs. A one I came to find out about in the first hour of my first visit to the local toastmasters club. Maybe it was amplified in the club I tried, but I believe many more clubs suffer from the same flaw because it’s in the very nature of a toastmasters clubs’ educational process.

So what’s the flaw?

Well,

You can’t teach something if you’re incompetent!

Check this out:

Two weeks ago in my first visit to the club, along with a close friend of mine, we were first introduced to the club’s president and the vice president. They were both very nice people. In fact, most of the members seemed to be very welcoming and we were very optimistic and eager to join the club.

So the meeting started with their usual weird-at-first-time rituals. Then came the prepared speeches part in which it was president’s turn that week to give out a prepared speech. The subject had something to do with internet protocols. However, that’s all I could gather from his speech. It was all downhill from there!

I literally couldn’t believe the way he was giving the speech. It was like he read up on everything wrong you can do when giving a speech, and decided to do them all, with no exception!

For example:

  • His back faced us instead of his face most of the time.
  • And that’s because he was reading computer-jargon-filled bullet points one by one off his slides.
  • Speaking of slides, do we still call them slides when they’re more like crammed textbook pages?

Those are just few of the unbelievable things the "president" did in order to not convey any meaningful piece of information from his speech.

Round of applause everyone, for the club president!

You’ll have to forgive my sarcastic tone in this post, but if the president was this "good", I thought: "I’m bound to learn something every other week watching him and just doing the opposite!".

The fact of the matter is, it wasn’t only the president. As the meeting progressed, I discovered that practically everybody in the club was a beginner. There’s nothing wrong with that. Well, that’s until beginners try to teach each other something, then we kind of run into a deadlock situation where there’s very little (if any) progress made.

Furthermore, any possible progress is further hampered by the fact that we have to be "supportive" to fellow toastmasters. The idea of being supportive, in my opinion, was misunderstood. Yes, we are not supposed to laugh in your face when you mistakenly pronounce "peanuts" something else, but we also should be very critical of everything else wrong you do in your speech, and spit that out (nicely) when doing the evaluation. That wasn’t the case with this local club.

Conclusion

A Toastmasters club is a "learn-by-doing" workshop. Nothing is wrong with that. But don’t you think this model is really flawed when you have nobody from within the club to learn from or even imitate?

That’s why I quit my local toastmasters club. It was just not worth waking up every weekend Friday 8 AM and paying those once and bi-weekly fees and putting down the preparation effort. The progress I’m going to make is sure going to be very minimal. It’s just not worth it.

Maybe a different club is the solution. But for now, so long toastmasters!